All comparisons
HiveTerm vs Conductor
Conductor runs parallel Claude Code and Codex agents in isolated git worktrees on your Mac. HiveTerm goes further, it runs your whole dev stack on any OS, with a built-in MCP server that lets agents spawn their own sub-agents.
| Feature | HiveTerm | Conductor |
|---|---|---|
| Agents collaborate in Discussions | ||
| Live split-pane grid of different agents | ||
| Claude, Codex, Antigravity & Grok | ||
| Sub-agent tree (MCP) | ||
| Pins & notes, agent-managed (MCP) | ||
| Runs your dev stack (servers, workers) | ||
| macOS, Windows & Linux | ||
| Config-as-code workspace | ||
| Inline diff, commit & PR | ||
| Voice prompts | ||
| 3 languages (EN/PT/ES) |
Where HiveTerm wins
- Cross-platform: Conductor is macOS-only; HiveTerm also runs on Windows and Linux.
- Agents spawn their own sub-agents through the Queen MCP server, visible in a live tree.
- Dev servers, watchers and workers run as managed bees, not just agents.
When Conductor is the better pick
- You work only on macOS and want git-worktree isolation per agent out of the box.
- You want a review-and-merge flow centered purely on parallel agents.
Try HiveTerm free
Download, open a project, and watch your agents work side by side. 60 seconds to decide.
Download for Free